( ESNUG 590 Item 03 ) --------------------------------------------- [03/26/21]

Subject: Reader snarkies to Cooley's report on Palladium/Veloce/Zebu boxes

    Editor's Note: Almost every time I publish, readers send me these
    concise replys that are sometimes insightful, but are more often
    cynical -- which is why I call them "snarkies".  Enjoy.  - John

There it was.  Their own public admission, SNPS HW sales peaked in CY2019.
Time to dig through the analysts reports to see if they confirmed this.
         
  "... we've inferred [SNPS] hardware revenues of more than $70 million,
   up over 30% year/year and up over $15 million from 3Q20 (perhaps
   including some incremental demand from its largest customer); if correct,
   this would imply FY20 HW revenues of about $220 million, down slightly."

       - Jay Vleeschhouwer, Griffin Securities Synopsys Report, Q4 FY2020

  "Verification HW, was very strong in 4Q, but down slightly y/y for F20."

       - Rich Valera, Needham & Co. Synopsys Report, Q4 FY2020

      - Cooley's 2021 report on Palladium/Veloce/Zebu HW boxes

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    You picked the right two analysts to quote on this.

    Both Jay and Rich know EDA inside and out.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Jay gives detailed numbers, and his analysis is good.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I'll bet that your best info came from Jay's reports.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Why didn't you quote my own research?

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I call Rich Valera the Condenser.  He can take a complicated set
    of data and render it to a few well chosen words like a pro.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Couldn't you have gotten a more recent pic of Jay?
     
    He looks like Mr. Brady of the Brady Bunch in that pic.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I made a killing off of Jay's advice to buy AVNT back in 1999.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

The exceptional "2x speed-up" and "double the capacity" gains only happen
when a totally new custom processor chip is introduced -- which is why
whomever has the newest chip at the new node takes ~80% of the emulation
sales following 24 to 36 months after the new chip is released.  The 2nd
new chip at the same mode grabs ~60% in backlash sales after its launch.
     
A new uP chip -- especially at a new node -- is the difference between
riding a racehorse and driving a Lamborghini in the Monaco Grand Prix.
Yesterday's technology was great for yesterday's emulation/acceleration,
but it's not enough for emulating/accelerating today's chips.

      - Cooley's 2021 report on Palladium/Veloce/Zebu HW boxes

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Excellent analysis.   You should call it Cooley's Emulation Law.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    It's just like PC's.  It's always been about the fasted processors.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Spot on.  SW updates are window dressing compared to HW gains.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Good job.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    No surprise here.  This mimics the Intel vs. AMD story.

    The new processor dominates new sales.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Good article.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Yup.  The emulation market parallels the PC market.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    The newest node always rules.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Why those 60% backlash sales?  That doesn't make sense!

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Those 2nd new chip sales are because a 2nd new chip is cheap to make.

    Cheap chips make Veloces cheaper than Palladiums for the same job.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    A 28nm CDNS uP in 2015 costs a lot more to fab than a 28nm MENT uP does
    three years later in 2018.  The 60% "backlash" sales are bargan hunting
    customers buying drastically lower priced Veloce boxes.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I'll bet the 60% backlash sales are based on relationship.  

    The Mentor Veloce sales guys are slick.

    They could sell ice cubes to eskimos.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I find it surprising that the new node takes 80% of the new sales.

    Shouldn't it be 95% instead?

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Why would any competitive systems house buy an old node uP emulator
    once a new node is out?

    I doubt your 20% remainder.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    This isn't rocket science to any hardware designer.

    The newest node is always king.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Good article.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    You did your homework there.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

But take the same data and annualize it came up with:
Showing a clear trend of CDNS HW (11.6% CAGR) outpacing SNPS HW (1.6% CAGR)
by a 10.0% CAGR.

Then I remembered Anirudh became president of Cadence in 2017 -- making
this an accidental report card on Anirudh's HW performance.  

My congrats go to Anirudh.

      - Cooley's 2021 report on Palladium/Veloce/Zebu HW boxes

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    This is why Anirudh makes the big bucks.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    This isn't Anirudh *doing* anything.  

    It's the many layers of staff under him who's doing all the work.

    Anirudh's job is to pick the right people and hope they don't %$%$ up.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I used to get pissed when a company's fat cats would get credit
    for the work that their worker-peasants did until I worked in
    a few companies with dysfunctional management.

    My congrats go to Anirudh, too.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Hellava lot better than the Mike Fister years, I tell you.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I pray my 401k makes a 12% CAGR this year.  The DJIA is too high.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

     
A new uP chip -- especially at a new node -- is the difference between
riding a racehorse and driving a Lamborghini in the Monaco Grand Prix.

      - Cooley's 2021 report on Palladium/Veloce/Zebu HW boxes

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I always enjoy and appreciate your analysis, but boy did you mess up
    bad in your most recent post!

    Anybody who follows Formula 1 knows that the Monaco Grand Prix is
    a Formula 1 event, and Lamborghini doesn't race in Formula 1.  A
    better analogy would be comparing a racehorse to a Ferrari (the car
    company who has been competing in F1 the longest), although Mercedes
    has been unbeatable for the past several years.

    (I guess they have a new chip. 8-)

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Lamborghini NEVER races in the Monaco Grand Prix.

    But since you're obviously American, you wouldn't know this.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    It's Ferrari in the Monaco Grand Prix.  Not Lamborghini.
    Didn't they make a movie showing Ferraris in the Grand Prix?

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I'm just glad you referenced a Grand Prix.  Most Americans know
    absolutely nothing about racing beyond NASCAR and the Indy 500.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Come to China.

    I'll take you to the Shanghai International Circuit.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    How do you know that's a racehorse and not a horse doing dressage?

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

         
And ironically, the only continual loser here is Synopsys -- because Zebu
and HAPS hardware is tied to whatever Xilinx decides to sell.  Aart's ZeBu
boxes use Xilinx FPGAs as their emulation processor; and his HAPS boxes use
either Xilinx or Altera FPGAs as their processor.  Problem is Intel bought
out Altera (and Altera has languished since); and AMD just acquired Xilinx
(promising that Xilinx might languish, too, if AMD wants Xilinx for focus
on the I/O-speed-at-all-costs Server market instead of the Big Ass Capacity
FPGA For Emulation/Prototyping/Acceleration market.)
Search for "CapEx on data center investment" and you'll see it's around
$137 billion -- while Emulation CapEx is around $750 million -- so it's
not all that difficult to see where AMD will direct Xilinx R&D to go.

      - Cooley's 2021 report on Palladium/Veloce/Zebu HW boxes

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I left Altera right before Intel bought us.  From what my buddies tell
    me, "languished" in a gross understatement.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Intel bought us in 2014 to lock in their 14nm 3D Tri-Gate sales.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Oh, so you too noticed nothing big has come out since the Stratix 10?

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Insightful analysis on how AMD should direct Xilinx R&D.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    CapEx is a nice yet misleading proxy on high end FPGA market sales.

    Start with your fact that the entire EDA HW market is $750 million.

       1/3 for Synopsys share: $250 million
       40% is margin, leaving: $150 million
      50% is PCB and SW costs:  $75 million
       50% is FPGA chip costs:  $75 million

    You're right, John.  You just didn't have the right numbers.  Having
    Xilinx R&D pursue a $75 million TAM is stupid when a $14 billion TAM
    in FPGA sales to the Server market is right there.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I have no doubts that AMD management will manage Xilinx with the
    exact same skills and accumen that Intel management did with Altera.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Check out Achronix shipping $100M in "Test and Measurement" FPGAs to
    Intel -- a big Synopsys customer.
     
    Maybe Intel is building internal emulation hardware and saving $$$?

    Synopsys HW has underperformed at Intel over last 2 to 3 years,
    and this might explain the whodunnit!

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Clever analysis.  Aart's ZeBu and HAPS are in trouble.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

There are 3 possible futures to look out for.

  - If Cadence announces a NEW chip while Mentor is still on their OLD
    chip -- Happy Anirudh, Sad Ravi, and Sad Aart.
                           
  - If Mentor announces a NEW chip while Cadence is still on their OLD
    chip -- Sad Anirudh, Happy Ravi, and Sad Aart.
                           
  - If *both* Mentor announces a NEW chip and Cadence announces a NEW
    chip -- Happy Anirudh, Happy Ravi, and Sad Aart.
                           
The only constant in all these EDA HW box futures is "Sad Aart".

      - Cooley's 2021 report on Palladium/Veloce/Zebu HW boxes

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    I did not tell you this.

    You will have a Happy Anirudh and a Happy Ravi within 30 days.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Watch for that third option.  It may happen sooner than you think.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----
    From your own see-saw chart, Anirudh will have a new chip at
    a lower node this year and Ravi's folks aren't due until 2024.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    Happy Ravi is coming next week!

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    ==* Spoiler Alert! *==

    Both Cadence and Mentor are launching new chips next month.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

    My Synopsys guys tell me to ignore Cooley.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

Related Articles:

    An accidental report card on Anirudh's HW accelerators/emulators
    Sawicki and Anirudh on Veloce2, Crystal 3, Palladium Z1, Zebu4
    CDNS Protium crazy fast "Palladium-compiles" #1a for Best of 2019
    SCOOP -- will the new MENT Veloce Crystal 3 chip crush Palladium?
    Jean-Marie warns Synopsys Zebu needs 9X more "warm bodies" to run
    A surly Jean-Marie sasses Cadence Palladium and Synopsys EVE Zebu
    Frank on Lauro missed Palladium job throughput 3X faster vs. Zebu
    The 14 metrics - plus their gotchas - used to select an emulator
    MENT bigwigs say Veloce 2 will pass CDNS Palladium by end-of-2012

Join    Index    Next->Item






   
 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.






















Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)