( SNUG 10 Item 1 ) ---------------------------------------------- [04/22/10]

Subject: How 238 users rated the Best and Worst Synopsys tools

READING THE TEA LEAVES:  The best way to find out what's hot and what's not
is to directly ask the users.  All answers have been scaled to 100 users.

  "Which Synopsys product(s) are you *most* satisfied with? (write in)"

    Design Compiler :  ######################## 47%
          PrimeTime :  ##################### 42%
                VCS :  ######### 17%
        IC Compiler :  ##### 9%
           TetraMAX :  ### 5%
              Astro :  ### 5%
             HSPICE :  ## 3%
           Synplify :  ## 3%
            Star-RC :  ## 2%
              PT-SI :  ## 2%
             Zroute :  ## 2%
       DFT Compiler :  ## 2%
          Formality :  # 1%
             VCS-MX :  # 1%
           Milkyway :  # 1%
          Sentaurus :  # 1%
               LEDA :  # 1%
                UPF :  # 1%
                VMM :  # 1%

Yup, that's a total of 146%!  That means customers, on average, named 1.46
Synopsys products that they were MOST satisfied with.

As far as individual tools go, it's no surprize that DC, PT and VCS get
such good ratings -- they're generally seen as best-in-class in their space.

Even though it's being phased out, Astro seems to still have a following.

The one controversial tool is IC Compiler (9% positive).  Watch below:

  "Which Synopsys product(s) are you *least* satisfied with? (write in)"

        IC Compiler :  ############## 27%
          Formality :  ####### 14%
    Design Compiler :  ####### 13%
               LEDA :  #### 8%
          PrimeTime :  ### 6%
                UPF :  ### 6%
           Hercules :  ### 5%
           Synplify :  ### 5%
          PrimeRail :  ### 4%
                VCS :  ## 3%
              PT-SI :  ## 3%
                VIP :  ## 3%
           TetraMAX :  ## 2%
              Astro :  ## 2%
       DFT Compiler :  ## 2%
             HSPICE :  # 1%
            Star-RC :  # 1%
     Power Compiler :  # 1%
           Milkyway :  # 1%
         DesignWare :  # 1%
    Custom Designer :  # 1%

Oops!  That IC Compiler (9% positive) also has a (27% negative) -- which is
discussed in depth in SNUG10 #10 -- let's just say that a lot of users see
ICC as a "problem child".

Formality getting a 14% negative is nothing new; it's always had issues.
Same for LEDA's 8% negative.

What's a little troubling is Design Compiler getting 13% negative.  There's
been some atypical user comments about DC's quality that I found:

   "Reduce bugs in Primetime and DC.  Their quality has dropped over
    the last few years.  Before we never got bad logic out of DC."

         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

   "dc_shell.  Why do I still have to wait until SP4 or 5 before it
    is safe to use the latest release?"

         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

   "Overhaul the whole DC?  More and more, it looks like the whole tool
    is growing cancer tissue..."


Count up all the "positive" percentages and you'll get a total of 146%,
That means customers, on average, named 1.46 Synopsys products that they
were MOST satisfied with.

Count up all the "negative" percentages and you'll get a total of 109%,
That means customers, on average, named 1.09 Synopsys products that they
were LEAST satisfied with.

To measure an EDA company's portfolio overall, I track the RATIO of total
"positives" over total "negatives" -- for this year 146% / 109% = 1.34X.

                               Synopsys
                        "Best"         "Worst"
                      tool votes      tool votes      ratio
                     ------------    ------------    -------
              2001        306            144          2.13X
              2002        344            131          2.63X
              2003        371            172          2.16X
              2004        351            155          2.26X
              2005        351            167          2.10X
   Today ---> 2010        146%           109%         1.34X

                                Cadence
              2004        142            115          1.23X

From this survey, it appears that customer happiness for Synopsys tools has
dropped significantly -- down to the same levels Cadence had back in 2004.
Maybe this is a function of SNPS overtaking Cadence's #1 position in EDA
since 2004 and that supporting a larger customer base is much harder now?

   "Moderate Sell -- I see Primetime and DC being (finally) seriously
    challenged.  If SNPS loses the edge there, their licensing will
    suffer.  They brought this on themselves with their crappy support."
    
         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

   "I'd change their customer support.  Their AEs are invisible.  One
    AE per million customers?"

         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

   "Change the size of the support organization and their responsiveness.
    I'd double or tripe the support capabilities."

Or maybe the fact that two main SNPS tools, IC Compiler and Design Compiler
are the lion's share (27% + 13% = 40%) of the "negatives" and their issues
alone are dragging SNPS' average down overall?  (i.e. the rest is OK.)

   "I've never professed to be anything but an average student."

        - Dan Qualye, 44th Vice President of the United States
Sign up for ESNUGs! Fun!    Index    Next->Item













   
 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)