( ESNUG 576 Item 2 ) ---------------------------------------------- [09/22/17]

Subject: Dean Drako on IC Manage PeerCache P2P caching EDA tool accelerator
                DAC'17 Troublemakers Panel in Austin, TX

   Cooley: Dean.  Last year, IC Manage, you announced this tool called
           PeerCache P2P Caching and Shiv Sikand just did an update of it 
           right before this DAC in ESNUG 571 #5.  It was all about EDA tool
           speed up and blah blah blah. 

           How is IC Manage going to compete against rival filer systems?
           I mean why buy something from a small guy like you when I can
           get it from a big ass NetApp or Isilon or something like that?
           Why should I buy it from you?

     Dean: IC Manage PeerCache doesn't compete with the filers or the EMCs
           or the Dells file systems or filers.

   Cooley: How would it not? I don't understand.  It's a speed up, it's a 
           workplace repopulation...

     Dean: It's software, first of all -- it's not hardware.  It accelerates
           the access to files, access to data, access to unmanaged or 
           managed data by about 10x over what you'd get with the filer.  It
           does that by creating a peer-to-peer network of all the compute 
           and nodes in your system, then using those as caches.  

           We love the filers.  The filers are great, they do a great job of
           being the storage of record, of giving IT all the tools they 
           need.  But unfortunately, when you're running your tools, your 
           tools are I/O wait state a little bit too much.  I/O wait state 
           means that they're going slow.

           What IC Manage does is eliminate all those bottlenecks using a 
           peer-to-peer file system.  If you think about it, there's a big 
           change that Intel's pushing with the introduction of NVMe 
           storage.  The distance between the storage system and the compute
           is shrinking, because the NVMe is much more like memory. 
 
   Cooley: Right.

     Dean: So, you get a lot lower latency and you can get a lot higher 
           performance out of it.  Well that doesn't really work so well if
           you're using NFS over this tiny little twisted pair of Ethernet 
           to a filer that's across the room or across the campus.
           The latency in the I/O wait state that your EDA tools end up in, 
           grind them to a halt.  You get maybe 100 megabytes of data that
           you get from one of those.  What we're seeing with our system is
           about 600-700 kinds of megabytes of data feeding into the tools, 
           so the tool can basically not be in that wait state. 

           The great thing about it is it's a software only solution.  It 
           works with any DM.  It works with unmanaged data.  So, you can 
           get significant tool speed up.

   Cooley: Okay, Cool.

        ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

Related Articles:

    Anirudh, Sawicki, Hogan go at it over the CDNS Pegasus DRC launch
    Dean Drako on IC Manage PeerCache P2P caching EDA tool accelerator
    Prakash sees 3X revenue in 2017 by crushing SNPS Atrenta Spyglass
    Amit on Solido machine learning, lib characterization, and Siri

Join    Index    Next->Item






   
 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.



Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)