( ESNUG 559 Item 1 ) -------------------------------------------- [04/22/16]

Subject: Sanjiv on High Level Synthesis (HLS), C-based design, and Calypto
             DAC'15 Troublemakers Panel in San Francisco, CA


   Cooley: Sanjiv, high level synthesis and C-based synthesis?  That
           was a hot topic... like 5 years ago.  Actually it was big fight
           back then between Mentor Catapult and Forte and Cadence C2Silicon
           and Synfora.  Now it has kind of dried up.

           Is your Catapult tool a solution looking for a problem to solve?

   Sanjiv: That's a good question.  I think we had a lot of marketing
           battles 5 years ago.  And now we are at the fun stage of actually
           getting chips designed in large quantities.

           Just right before this panel, I kicked off a presentation by
           NVIDIA, where they talked about all the video components in their
           new Tegra X1 chip, that were designed with our Catapult high
           level synthesis tool.

           So if you look at the NVIDIA shield, for example, that just came
           out with streaming 4K -- all of the 4K processing was done - was
           designed with C-based high level synthesis.  And then later today
           I will be kicking off a presentation from Qualcomm, where they're
           also designing parts of their Snapdragon with Catapult high level
           synthesis.  So it's come to the phase now where HLS technology
           has matured. 

           High level synthesis is good for algorithmic blocks.  But these
           algorithmic blocks are getting much more complex.  And they are
           becoming much more important on your chips.  So companies like
           NVIDIA and Qualcom and Samsung are bringing a HLS into their
           flows.  And they feel that they can't be competitive in the long
           term without having high level synthesis.

   Cooley: Why isn't Aart selling in that space?  He has the same
           customers.

   Sanjiv: It's a question you should ask Aart.

   Cooley: Ok, he's not here.

    Hogan: Another, well, you could ask the question of "who's made
           the most money off behavioral since its high level synthesis,
           right?  So I'd argue that AutoESL is the only one that ever made
           an money, right?
   Cooley: Anirudh, are you making any money in high level synthesis?

  Anirudh: Yes, so I think Cadence bought Forte last year combined
           with C-to-Silicon.

    Cooley: Yeah, the rumor is you replaced C-to-Silicon completely
           with Forte internally.

   Anirudh: No, I think the two teams are combined.  And I think if
           I remember their numbers right, Cadence is still the dominant
           supplier in high level synthesis in terms of market share.  And
           it is profitable.  It's not a very big business, but it is a
           profitable business.

   Cooley: Gary, who's telling the truth here?

     Gary: Who's the largest?

   Cooley: Yeah

     Gary: Oh, it's Cadence.

   Cooley: By a lot?

     Gary: As far as adopting new flows, Calypto really is entering
           the market.  I mean they haven't even gotten close to hitting
           any curve yet.  If I were a designer, I would prefer the Calypto
           tool.  But that Forte tool's been around for a long time.

   Cooley: Sanjiv.

   Sanjiv: Yes, sir.

   Cooley: Is Calypto part of Mentor or not?

   Sanjiv: Well, Mentor is a part of Calypto.  Mentor is a big share
           holder.  But Calypto is an independent company.  We have other
           shareholders also.

   Cooley: So, Wally and Greg report to you regularly.

   Sanjiv: No, no they own a piece of Calypto.  They own a piece of
           Calypto.  And we are an independent company with our own sales
           force.  We have a board that includes non-Mentor members and we
           operate...

   Cooley: Like one of non-Mentor board member?

   Sanjiv: We have well two. Two out of four.

   Cooley: Jim, is he speaking the truth?

    Hogan: Yeah, well if you if you read the report it's a wholly-
           owned subsidiary, right?  So when you own that much of a
           company, like how Mentor does, you have consolidate their
           earnings and losses, right?

   Sanjiv: It's the majority owned subsidiary.

    Hogan: Yeah a majority owned-subsidiary.  So I believe Calypto
           has their own channel.  I believe they have their own
           marketing, their own R&D.  But technically it's a subsidiary.

         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----

Related Articles

    Sanjiv on High Level Synthesis (HLS), C-based design, and Calypto
    Anirudh on CDNS Innovus, SNPS ICC2, Atoptech, MENT Olympus PnR
    Amit on the SPICE wars, fast vs. pure, and SPICE user survey data
    Joe Sawicki on Mentor's relationship with Carl Icahn this year
    Why CDNS and MENT didn't bother to bid on the Atrenta acquisition


Join    Index    Next->Item






   
 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.





Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)