( ESNUG 505 Item 1 ) -------------------------------------------- [05/24/12]

Subject: TSMC & UMC 28 nm, TI, Nvidia "priority", Qualcomm, Forbes magazine

Last week, Taiwan Economic News reported UMC "has won 80 28 nm tapeouts".

During his 11Q4 financial call Morris Chang, CEO of TSMC said:

   "We have so far completed 36 individual 28 nm tapeouts in 2011 and
    have scheduled another 132 individual product tapeouts in 2012."

        - Morris Chang, CEO of TSMC (01/18/12)

This 132 vs. 80 tape-outs for 2012 is due to TSMC's capacity problems:

   "The success of UMC is thought to have derived from a shortage of
    capacity at TSMC.  UMC started general production of 28 nm in Q1;
    TSMC started in Q4."

        - ElectronicsWeekly.com (05/17/12)

Thus benefiting UMC 28 nm:

   "This year, primary buyers of UMC's 28 nm process capacity would
    be Texas Instruments (TI) and Qualcomm.  TI's ARM-based multi-core
    processor OMAP 5 is a 28 nm process product while Qualcomm has
    contracted UMC to make its integrated baseband chips in the
    pilot stage."

        - CENS.com (05/17/12)

In related news, rumor is TSMC just gave Nvidia "priority" for 28 nm:

   "Apparently as the rumors say, Nvidia has been hunting for new
    foundry partners that could meet up its supply demand with
    Samsung already preparing qualification samples for the
    green team.  In response, TSMC is now giving higher priority
    to Nvidia over its other clients such as Qualcomm and AMD
    for the 28 nm fabrication process."

       - WCCFtech.com (05/10/12)

Which, curiously, is something Qualcomm had also done before:

   "This situation with Nvidia is mirrored by Qualcomm, which
    managed to gain priority earlier with the same tactic of
    outsourcing orders to gain more fab time."

       - LegitReviews.com (05/09/12)

This means the other TSMC 28 nm customers like Broadcom, TI and AMD aren't
going to be too happy plus this last comment directly above about Qualcomm
and the earlier UMC/Qualcomm quote implies that gaining 28 nm "priority"
at TSMC is still not enough -- which, interestingly Forbes magazine has
just confirmed with an article yesterday titled:

   Qualcomm Crumbles Under Supply Chain Issues But Concerns Are Overblown

   "Qualcomm's shares have been falling ever since it announced its
    Q2 FY2012 results last month.  While the results for the quarter
    were solid, supply chain issues for its 28 nm chipsets caused
    Qualcomm to give a subdued forecast for the next quarter.

    As a result, Qualcomm's shares have since fallen by close to 15% in
    less than a month.  ...

    Qualcomm expects its operating expenses to increase in the near-term
    as it tries to facilitate the production of additional 28 nm chipsets
    at fabs not run by TSMC, its current manufacturing partner, to
    augment supply."

        - Forbes.com (05/23/12)

If getting TSMC priority got this for Qualcomm, what will it do for Nvidia?

    - John Cooley
      DeepChip.com                               Holliston, MA

         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

Related articles:

     "TSMC meets less than 70% of 28 nm chip demand at present"
     After 14 weeks, TSMC now finally admits it has 28 nm problems
     Chip designers confused/angered by terse TSMC 28 nm response
     Clueless TSMC Exec invokes 40 nm fiasco to explain 28 nm yields!

Join    Index    Next->Item






   
 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)