( ESNUG 472 Item 7 ) -------------------------------------------- [04/30/08]

Subject: ( ESNUG 464 #8 ) We taped out a 65 nm, 2 M instance chip with ETS

> For a 456K instance design with 557K nets:
> 
>               Cadence ETS non-SI runtime: 15 minutes
>                   Cadence ETS SI runtime: 3 hours
>
> A plus is the common timing engine (CTE) used for both First Encounter
> and ETS.  What this means is that the correlation between the P&R timing
> and signoff timing will be tighter.  Also ETS supports ECSM libs so it
> will be possible to do IR-drop using reports from Voltage Storm.
> 
>     - Jason Perez
>       Freescale Semiconductor                    Austin, TX


From: Umesh Srikantiah <usrikantiah=user domain=sandbridgetech not mom>

Hi John,

We recently taped out a 65 nm wireless design with 2 million instances.

Our Cadence ETS eval was done about 8 months ago and during it, we found
that ETS was within 15 psec of PrimeTime.

For this tape-out, the transition from PrimeTime to ETS was very smooth
and without hitches.

At the block level, our ETS runs on our processor core were 5 minutes
versus around 30 minutes for PrimeTime.

At the full chip level, our ETS run were 50 minutes versus 4 hours on
PrimeTime (on a previous version of our chip).

Support from our Cadence AE was excellent and quickly enabled us to come
up to speed with the tool & scripts.

    - Umesh Srikantiah
      Sandbridge Technologies                    Tarrytown, NY
Index    Next->Item











   
 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)