( ESNUG 448 Item 7 ) -------------------------------------------- [11/11/05]

Subject: ( ESNUG 447 #5 ) We Didn't Try to Use Silicon Ensemble at 130 nm

> I don't know whether to laugh at or pity the good folks at ST in Longmont,
> for their old timing driven flow in SE.  I mean they were trying to pass
> timing constraints thru SDF from DC!
>
>     - Wasim Altaf
>       Innotech Systems, Inc.                    Boston, MA


From: Raphael Bingert <raphael.bingert=user domain=st spot gone>

Hi John,

Wisam's observation makes a lot of sense if we're talking about implementing
a 130 nm chip with Silicon Ensemble -- but we're not.  My methodology with
SE was at 250 nm.  We started using PhysOpt at 180 nm.  I forgot to mention
that in my original post.

    - Raphael Bingert
      STmicroelectronics                         Longmont, CO
Index    Next->Item








   
 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)