( ESNUG 375 Item 3 ) -------------------------------------------- [06/28/01]

From: Grant Riley <grantril@us.ibm.com>
Subject: I Already Have Raphael; Should I Switch To Raphael NES (Quickcap)?

Hello, John,

I am a design kit developer for the IBM SIGE RF/Analog design kits.

I am interested in purchasing Raphael NES (Quickcap).  My group currently
has one copy of Raphael.  I know that Quickcap is most often used as a
'golden' capacitance extraction tool when comparing parasitic extraction
tool capacitance accuracy.  I currently use Raphael as our 'golden' 3D
extractor, but am thinking of replacing it with Quickcap.  I believe there
are many reasons for this switch.  Here are just a couple:

  - Quickcap offers full chip extraction for critical nets.

  - Quickcap is a full chip extraction tool.

  - Raphael works well for test structures, but for large structures the
    run times are not reasonable.

  - Raphael is more accurate than Quickcap for capacitance but the run
    times are long.

So the question is, is it worth switching to Quickcap knowing that Quickcap
is $78 K and I already have Raphael in house?

    - Grant Riley
      IBM


 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)