|
( ESNUG 356 Item 1 ) --------------------------------------------- [8/03/00] Subject: ( ESNUG 355 #13 ) 2nd Plea For Help On Opposite-Input Tri-states > In the "early" days of ESNUG there was a thread talking about a Synopsys > bug concerning the usage of tri-state buffers that have 2 enable inputs > that require opposite logic levels. I just ran into the same problem > and am trying to find a solution. Was there a solution posted (that I > didn't find)? > > I tried to use the 'pin_opposite' attribute in the library but Design > Compiler failed to map the tri-state buffers. I tried the 'x_function' > with the same result. I tried the 'contention_condition' with the result > that Design Compiler mapped the tri-state buffers but tied one input to > VCC (as it did without any special attribute). > > I think there must be someone who has solved this problem. > > - Volker Rzehak > Texas Instruments Deutschland Germany From: Volker Rzehak <v-rzehak@ti.com> John, Unfortunately I didn't receive any feedback from my post on ESNUG and I'm not able to solve the problem up to now. I am quite stuck. The only solution I can think of at the moment is either to do it manually or use tristate buffers with one input (and bigger area requirements). Help! - Volker Rzehak Texas Instruments Deutschland Germany |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too." This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days Copyright 1991-2011 John Cooley. All Rights Reserved. | Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form | |
!!! "It's not a BUG, /o o\ / it's a FEATURE!" ( > ) \ - / _] [_ (jcooley 1991) |
||||||||