( ESNUG 381 Item 10 ) ------------------------------------------- [11/08/01]

From: Daniel Szoke <Daniel.Szoke@nsc.com>
Subject: Seeking User Experiences With New VHDL To Verilog Transation Tools

Hi, John,

We need to do a design involving mixed VHDL & Verilog.  Our first preference
would be to translate the VHDL parts to Verilog (our standard language) for
maintainability.  I would like to question your readers regarding their
experience with translation tools.  (ESNUG dealt with this issue back in
1995 but I expect there have been some advances since then.)  Especially:

   1. What VHDL constructs are/were translated
   2. Quality (readability) of the translated Verilog
   3. Compare synthesis of: VHDL -> gates VS. VHDL -> Verilog -> gates
   4. Compare sim of: mixed VHDL-Verilog VS. translated Verilog-Verilog

Thanks to all.

    - Daniel Szoke
      National Semiconductor                     Israel


 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)