( ESNUG 370 Item 14 ) ------------------------------------------- [05/17/01]

Subject: ( ESNUG 368 #9 ) Moody PrimeTime Runs Commands On Its Own Whim...

> Here is a quote from an engineer working with me:
>
>   "The worst problem that I've come across so far is PrimeTime's inability
>    to correctly implement false paths.  For example, setting false paths
>    between all asynchronous clock domains (as suggested by Synopsys) does
>    not always work."
>
> And another:
>
>  "Also use extreme caution with the 'reset_design' command, you can easily
>   be resetting far more than you bargained for!"
>
> I observed this "ignoring false paths" problem in the early days with
> PrimeTime.  The realy frustrating thing is that you do not get to find out
> the tool has (partially) ignored your command until you get the results
> from the next report.  Why, oh why, does it not tell you it has ignored
> you?  There seems to be no way to find out why either!
>
>     - Dyson Wilkes
>       Ericsson Microelectronics                  Europe


From: Tobias Thiel <tobias.thiel@motorola.com>

Hi, John,

In the recent weeks I also got very frustrated by PrimeTime when it was
either ignoring the set_case_analysis command or it was unwilling to reset
what was set with set_case_analysis.

As long as I was applying set_case_analysis to input ports everything is
working fine.  But when I set it on internal pins, like the clock input of
an extracted model that is instanciated, it sometimes simply shows no
effect.  And what is worse, in some cases I was able to set the case
analysis for a pin, but than I am unable to remove it!  Even a
reset_design won't do the job, I had to unlink the design and re-link it!

Luckily my customer was not relying on the timing information generated
with the PrimeTime script that I provided.  But since interface problems
like these are almost impossible to work around, he missed his deadline
and I was looking (or at least feeling) bad.

    - Tobias Thiel
      Motorola                                   Germany

         ----    ----    ----    ----    ----    ----   ----

From: Fu Hui <hfu@ezmsgp.hl.siemens.de>

Hi John,

We have same problem for PT-2000.05-2.  We change it back to PT-1999.10
and it works fine now.

  - Hui Fu
    Microcontroller ICs & DSP
    Infineon Technologies Asia Pacific


 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)