( ESNUG 351 Item 8 ) ---------------------------------------------- [5/4/00]

From: John Cooley 
Subject: Formality, Chrysalis, Verisity, and Cadence's Model Checking Tools

A few weeks ago, one of my readers forwarded me this anonymous post from
the Yahoo CDN stock chat board:

  "Formality sales of about $10M doesn't point to a market leader, it
   seems like a tool bundled into a larger deal for a very low price, which
   Synopsys can afford to do to build a market presence.  As you probably
   know, formal verification is divided into two areas, model checking and
   comparison checking.  Verplex is the runaway leader in comparison
   checking, and Chrysalis/Avanti still owns model checking.  Another area
   is test bench verification where Synopsys has no presence and Verisity
   is the leader here.  There is also a new company on the horizon that will
   challenge Verisity.  So Formality's survival is in question, and this
   area is hot and growing."

Why I'm reprinting this is that passing claim that "Chrysalis/Avanti still
owns model checking" -- is this true?  What are the customer experiences
with their model checking tools?  Why I ask this was while at HDLcon'00, I
ran into a Cadence marketing guy who said Cadence was doing very well in
the model checking business.  I would love to see a detailed customer review
of the Cadence model checking tools just to see if this Cadence marketdroid
was on-the-money or blowing smoke.  Inquiring minds want to know!

    - John Cooley
      the ESNUG guy


 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)