( ESNUG 343 Item 3 ) --------------------------------------------- [2/16/00]
Subject: ( ESNUG 342 #4 ) QuickBench More Cost-Effective Than Vera/Specman
> You've invited contributions on VERA and Specman, and I'd like to see our
> product added in there, too. Chronology QuickBench has a hardware
> verification language called RAVE which stacks up very well against VERA
> or Verisity's e language, along with a powerful tool for creating bus
> functional models.
>
> - Wade Hostler,
> Sr. Apps Engineer
> Chronology Corporation Oceanside, CA
From: Andrew Frazer <Andy.Frazer@idt.com>
John,
My company, IDT, evaluated VERA, Specman and Quickbench about one year ago.
Although VERA and Specman are very powerful system verification solutions,
Quickbench is a more cost-effective solution. QB may not do everything
that VERA and Specman can do, it does do most of what the design groups
wants and is, therefore, easier to learn.
If you're looking for a system verification solution, you should consider
all three: Quickbench, VERA and Specman.
- Andy Frazer
Integrated Device Technology Santa Clara, CA
|
|
