( ESNUG 254 Item 4 ) -------------------------------------------- [11/6/96]

Subject: (ESNUG 253 #11) I Can't Resest "max_capacitance" Post-layout? Damn!

> While receiving a post-layout netlist we usually get some/many design rule
> violations depending on the design and the quality of the libraries.
> Usually max_capacitance violations can be ignored if they're less than
> 150% and you do not want to change the netlist more than necessary.  It
> seems Design Compiler is not capable of handling this problem since it
> will try to remove *all* violations.  It is not possible to increase the 
> max_capacitance value?!!  (Does anyone not want this? Why?)  ...  We
> managed by manipulating (subtracting) capacitance from the data in the
> annotation-file.  However, this is not our preferred design methodology!
> Anyone else having other ways of solving this problem ?


From: [ Northern Exposure ]

Hi John,

Thanks for your work on ESNUG. From your recent mailings, I get the feeling
your working on a second career in comedy.  Please keep me anon.

I've recently been through this and I succesfully used the following
command to change the max capacitance constraint on library cells:
 
 set_attribute LIBRARY_NAME/CELL_NAME/OUTPUT_PIN_NAME max_capacitance X

If you got fancy and used this in a script with the get_attribute command,
you could automate changing all library cells.  Also, you could ask your
ASIC vendor to provide a library with  all the max capacitance attributes
at 150%, or modify it yourself if you have the source code.

  - [ Northern Exposure ]



 Sign up for the DeepChip newsletter.
Email
 Read what EDA tool users really think.


Feedback About Wiretaps ESNUGs SIGN UP! Downloads Trip Reports Advertise

"Relax. This is a discussion. Anything said here is just one engineer's opinion. Email in your dissenting letter and it'll be published, too."
This Web Site Is Modified Every 2-3 Days
Copyright 1991-2024 John Cooley.  All Rights Reserved.
| Contact John Cooley | Webmaster | Legal | Feedback Form |

   !!!     "It's not a BUG,
  /o o\  /  it's a FEATURE!"
 (  >  )
  \ - / 
  _] [_     (jcooley 1991)